No. 839 / Sep. 23, 2001
@Seeking gRetaliationh
is also Medieval Barbarity
@ The U.S.
Should First gReflecth on its own Actions
The 20th Century
was the age of U.S. Imperialism
@Editorial: Miyazawa Kiichi, A
Master Philistine
@@@@Using Sophistry to Justify the gRight of Collective
Self-Defenseh
@Series: The Wavering gZokugiinh
Diet Members
@@@@Exposing the So-Called gForces of Resistanceh [within the
LDP](#5)
@Series: Lies and
Distortions
@@@@Criticism of the New Junior High School History Textbook
(#12)
@Terrorism Cannot Be Defended,
Butc
@@@@U.S.
Imperialism Invites Such Actions
@@@@The Position
of the JCP is Identical to that of the Ruling Class
@Regional Reports: The
Shamelessness of the Defiant Board of Education
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@(Saitama)
@Toshibafs Plan to Lay Off 17,000
Workers
@@@The Sweeping Collaboration of the Union
Leaders
@@@Workers Are Unable to See Any Prospects For
Struggle
@The Chinese Communist Party:
gBusinessmen Are Also Workersh
@@@The View That
They Are gAlso one Part of the Social Division of
Laborh
@The View That They Are gAlso one
Part of the Social Division of Laborh
@@@gNihon no
Keizai Kakusah (The Economic Gap in Japan)
From the article of
'Petrel'
No.839 / Sep. 23,
2001
Please send us your opinion and the impression about this article without reservation.
Seeking
gRetaliationh is also Medieval Barbarity
The U.S. Should First gReflecth on its own Actions
The 20th
Century was the age of U.S. Imperialism
Before Bush calls for grevengeh he should seriously
reflect on the reason why the hatred against the U.S. exploded in this sort of
barbaric attack.
Without such a
self-examination, how can such terrorism be fundamentally eliminated? It is
farcical and the height of stupidity for Bush to call for the elimination of
terrorism without considering at all the underlying contradictions and
causes.
Of course, we donft support the
terrorist action of the Islamic terrorists. And such terrorism is unquestionably
barbaric. However, it is not simply a barbaric act, but also the manifestation
of some cause.
Class conscious workers
throughout the world all know that the U.S. is in no position to say that
terrorism is bad no matter what the cause. This is because throughout the past
century the U.S. itself has often acted as a gterrorist state—a violent state
armed to the teeth—and it continues to behave this way on the world
stage.
The 20th century was the century of U.S.
imperialism
Throughout the past century the U.S.
government has carried out a large number of barbaric terrorist actions against
the people and nations of the world.
For example, in the Middle East the U.S. has supported, and continues to
support, state terrorism against the Arabs living within the boundaries of the
Israeli state. This is precisely the reason why some Arabs have rejoiced over
the fact that the U.S. has been attacked.
During the Gulf War, the U.S. intervened militarily in the Middle East,
and this was fundamentally connected to the fact that this region is the great
producer of the oil that the U.S. is desperate to control. In other words, this
was fundamentally connected to the interests of American monopoly
capital.
The U.S. has ignored the Kyoto
Protocol concerning the environmental problem, and along with Israel withdrew
from the world conference on racism. Even acknowledging that such meetings and
agreements are essentially meaningless, this does not provide a basis for the
U.S. government to reject them. As an imperialist state, the U.S. behaves in a
nakedly egoistic, self-serving, and self-centered way. In fact, the 20th century
was the gAmerican ageh—that is the century of American
imperialism.
Beginning with the
occupation of the Philippines at the end of the 19th century, the U.S. emerged
as an imperialist state, and through two world wars it developed into the
strongest state in the world. Following the Second World War it struggled with
the USSR for world hegemony, eventually winning this conflict to become the
worldfs only gsuperh imperialist state in the world.
During this time, backed by its economic and military power,
the U.S. has dominated the world, carrying out barbaric acts of violence
throughout the world waging a number of reactionary wars. And most of these
conflicts of these were fought outside of the borders of the United
States.
In these wars, the number of
American causalities was only a fraction of that of the opposing countries. For
the U.S. no matter how reactionary a war, it could be waged with little loss of
human life on the domestic front. For this reason, the U.S. government was able
to nonchalantly carry out barbarous acts.
America Doesnft Know the Pain of
Imperialist War
Consider, for instance, the war between the United
States and Japan.
Seen from either side,
this war was a reactionary imperialist war. This war was a wager on who would
gain ghegemony over the Pacific.h
However, in this war there was an enormous difference between Japan and
the U.S. in terms of causalities, since there was such a gap between their
arsenals of modern weaponry. Moreover, the war was waged near Japan, and the
ghome islandsh of Japan (Okinawa, etc.). Also, the territory of Japan was the
object of gindiscriminate attacks,h completely destroying residential areas and
killing a large number of civilians.
In
that imperialist war, the number of causalities on the U.S. gmainlandh was
nearly zero. On the other hand, the following list of causalities can be
cited:
In the famous March 10, 1945
firebombing of Tokyo, 100,000 people were burned to death in a single night, and
a million people lost their homes.
The
firebombing of Yokohama claimed a total of 4,616 people, and destroyed about
10,000 homes.
On June 19, dozens of B29s
destroyed about 60 percent of city of Shizuoka, wiping out about 25,000
households.
In Hamamatsu, where
munitions factories were located, 27 bombing raids occurred, wiping out 92
percent of the homes there, and 1,057 people were killed alone on the fiercest
air raid on June 18.
In Sendai on
July 10, an air raid claimed 900 lives, and in Aomori on July 28, 15,000 homes
were destroyed, killing 731 people.
In Nagoya, starting from March in 1945, air attacks intensified, with the
number of dead eventually totaling 8,714.
In Osaka from December 1944 until the end of the war, 28 air attacks
occurred. In particular, the attack on March 14 killed 4,000 people in a single
day, and this number was relatively low due to the preparations in the wake of
the fire bombing of Tokyo.
The total of
dead in Kobe was around 6,235 people, with roughly 64 percent of the houses
destroyed.
In Fukuoka, the 1,146 people
were dead or missing from just one air raid on June 19, and about 13,000 homes
were destroyed.
The figures above
represent only some of the cities that were attacked by B29 bombing raids. In
all over 10 million people were driven from their homes, with 2.2 million homes
completely destroyed, and about 350,000 people losing their
lives.
Finally, there were the nuclear
attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This killed about 160,000 people in Hiroshima
at one blow (38 percent of the population), and in Nagasaki 74,000 people were
killed.
In considering U.S. imperialism
here, couldnft we say that these gindiscriminate attacks,h which killed
civilians and even employed nuclear weapons, were
gbarbarich?
Some may say that these
attacks were justified either because it was war and there was no alternative or
that it was grevengeh for Pearl Harbor. Still, the U.S. casualties from Pearl
Harbor were only about 2,300.
Of
course, monopoly capital and reactionaries in Japan who waged an imperialist
war. bear the responsibility for the Japanese victims. The military and the
Emperor did not recognize defeat, continued the war even calling for a war to
the end on the mainland and for this reason the U.S. expanded its air raids, and
even went so far as to drop two nuclear bombs.
However, just considering the gindiscriminate air attacks,h including the
nuclear attacks, it can only be said that these were ginhuman,h and this exposes
the reactionary and barbaric nature of imperialist
wars.
There is no basis to say
that since this was an imperialist war, gindiscriminate air attacksh were not
barbarous. Rather, for the very reason that it was an imperialist war, these
attacks ended up being barbaric and reactionary.
Moreover, if one argues that there is no alternative in war,
how could one criticize the terrorist attacks of the Islamic fundamentalists.
Didnft Bush himself say that gthis is war.h For the U.S. a state of war means
that everything is allowed, including gindiscriminate air
attacks.h
Japanese imperialism, of
course, also killed many people in brutal military actions in China and other
Asian countries. The only difference between the imperialistic barbarity of the
Japan and the U.S. is that Japan, in defeat, was forced to gexamineh its own
actions and dissolve its own imperialism and militarism (but since the ruling
class did not decisively collapse, this was only a temporary situation.),
whereas the U.S., as the victor, kept its imperialism and militarism
intact.
What was attacked the
other day was this bloated U.S. imperialism and militarism. This imperialism has
been dispatched in more recent wars from the Korean War, to the Vietnam War to
wars in the Middle East, and been exposed. But the U.S. government has certainly
not undertaken any sort of gself-examination.h
What was attacked was this extremely malevolent U.S. imperialism and
hegemonism that has ruled the 20th century. This was not, as the bourgeoisie say
gan attack against civilization,h or ga challenge to international societyh as
the Japanese Communist Party has claimed (Red Banner September
8).
Of course, violence cannot be
justified if it is grevenge,h and the Islamic radicals themselves view their own
actions as a form of grevenge,h and continue to do so.
Even though we criticize the goriginal sinh of American
imperialism, and ridicule the logic of grevenge,h we still do not accept the
logic of a gclash of civilizationsh in terms of a conflict between the West and
Islam (or Asia).
It is sufficient
for us to state that the rational of grevengeh offered by the U.S. is nothing
but an unfounded imperialistic rational. Our fundamental standpoint is
opposition to all imperialism—Western, Russian, Japanese, as well as
Chinese.
Terrorism is not carried out
for no reason at all. If terrorism is called barbaric, then American terrorism
(and all other actions that take the form of gstate terrorismh) is guilty of the
same crime.
There is no way to say
that state terrorism is justified, but all other forms of terrorism are not. If
terrorism is barbaric, the U.S. should begin by abandoning its own
terrorism.
What the U.S. needs to do
first is not the barbaric and medieval action of seeking gvengeance,h but a
fundamental examination of its own imperialistic nature.
The Impudent gLogich of
the United States
The U.S. always behaves this way. That is, even
while being armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons, they have the cheek to
refuse any other country to have these same weapons.
If the U.S. were not so arrogant, they would abandon their
nuclear weapons and make a declaration against these weapons being held by any
countries throughout the world. This is gcommonh sense in terms of a
non-hypocritical position. How can the U.S. expect anyone to take seriously the
idea that they alone should be allowed to amass a massive nuclear arsenal and
use it to threaten and suppress the entire world, but other countries should not
be allowed to have such weapons?
In
other words, the U.S. behaves as if it can indulge in any evil act, but others
cannot do the same. How can a state that displays such naked egoism, of a
gimmorality,h how claim to be the leader of the world and gain the trust of
other countries?
This U.S. is the most tyrannical and shameless
state in the world, and it has been behaving any way it deems fit throughout the
past century.
There are many people
throughout the world who have seen their relatives killed or lost their homes as
a result of the policies of the U.S. government.
The rule of American monopoly capital has increased the
poverty of the world, while on the other hand the country enjoys the highest
level of consumption in the world, with an astronomical level of energy
consumption per capita—thus a high level of environmentally hazardous CO2
production.
Americafs slogan of gfree
trade,h despite claiming to be a just cause, only serves to cover the
exploitation of the world by American monopoly capital, and what is worse, when
it suits its interests the U.S. shamelessly adopts trade
protectionism.
This sort of
opportunistic, self-serving approach, has only driven much of the world into
poverty. The fact that many are deaf to the calls of liberalism and democracy
and have reacted against the United States, is again the fault of the U.S.
policies.
It has already become
perfectly clear to the world that no matter how much the U.S. claims that its
own barbarous terrorism, i.e. its gretaliation,h is for the sake of freedom and
democracy, this is nothing but deceitful slogan that aims to cover its vicious,
self-satisfied acts and imperialist rule of the world.
Even though the greligioush rule of Islamic fundamentalists
is a medieval folly that seeks to return to the dark ages, and is in fact an
impossible anachronism, this still does not justify the false words of
liberalism and democracy which seek to cover the exploitation and barbarous
world rule of monopoly capital.
What is necessary for the United States is not grevenge,h but
self-examinationh and criticism of its own imperialism and
hegemonism.
And if this is not possible,
this means that American imperialism must be overthrown and swept away, and will
be done so, by the workers of the world.
In fact, the fact that the mainland of American imperialism has been
attacked in the first year of the new century can only be a sign of the
beginning of the fall of this enormous gempire.h
Just as the Roman Empire, feudalistic empires, and then a
number of bourgeois empires have fallen, so too will the gempireh of American
monopoly capital inevitably decline, and this marks the first
step.
The screams heard from within the
American gempireh now for revenge and vengeance, will only precipitate its own
decline. This is an inevitable glawh of history.
(Translated by
Roy)